Internet services suspended, prohibitory orders imposed in Jaipur for anti-encroachment drive


Mobile internet services were suspended, prohibitory orders issued, and a large number of police personnel were deployed on Monday (June 8, 2026) for a major anti-encroachment drive launched by the Jaipur Development Authority (JDA), which has started work on a long-pending road-widening project on Nandpuri underpass in Jagatpura area.An internet shutdown has been imposed for 24 hours as a precautionary measure to curb the spread of rumours and inflammatory contents on social media, which could disrupt the law and order situation.The 1.5-km road stretch in the south-eastern periphery of Jaipur, running parallel to a railway line, is being expanded from its current width of 25-30 feet to 80 feet.The anti-encroachment operation will also remove large-scale unauthorised structures which are obstructing public infrastructure projects in other parts of the State capital.The demolition drive includes the removal of five religious structures encroaching within the Nandpuri road’s designated boundary. The owners were given time earlier to remove the constructions voluntarily before any action was initiated. The religious structures include a mosque, two temples, a Satsang (devotional gathering) hall and a Mazaar (tomb).More than 3,000 police personnel were deployed across the city, including 12 companies of the Rajasthan Armed Constabulary (RAC), with increased surveillance in sensitive areas. Half-a-dozen bulldozers, excavators and dumpers for debris removal arrived at the location on Monday (June 8) morning.The Nandpuri area was cordoned off before the JDA commenced the operation and barricades were placed on major routes to halt general traffic. In his orders issued late on Sunday (June 7) night, Jaipur Divisional Commissioner V. Saravana Kumar said mobile internet restrictions would apply to 2G, 3G, 4G, and 5G services, as well as bulk SMS, MMS, and major social media platforms, till Monday (June 8) midnight.Prohibitory orders under Section 163 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) — which came into force on Sunday (June 7) evening — will remain effective till June 22 midnight. The restrictions prohibit rallies, demonstrations, processions, and public meetings without prior permission from authorities.Jaipur Police Commissioner Sachin Mittal said strict action would be taken against anyone who tries to inflame religious sentiments or circulate false information. “A strict watch is being maintained on anti-social elements who may attempt to disturb communal harmony through provocative statements or misleading contents,” Mr. Mittal said. Published - June 08, 2026 10:21 am IST

Artificial intelligence is no longer a speculative technology but an operational reality and poses one of the most significant tests for international law, Chief Justice of India Surya Kant has said, underlining that choices made during this decade will shape the future relationship between technology, power, freedom, and justice. He also stressed that technology itself is neither inherently benevolent nor inherently harmful.Speaking at a public lecture in Birkbeck College of University of London on "Artificial Intelligence and International Law", he said unlike previous technological revolutions, AI does not merely enhance human capacity; it increasingly participates in decision-making processes that were historically considered uniquely human."Technology itself is neither inherently benevolent nor inherently harmful. Its impact depends upon the legal, political, and ethical frameworks within which societies choose to deploy it. The responsibility of law, therefore, is neither to resist technological progress nor to surrender unquestioningly before it. Its responsibility is to ensure that technological power remains accountable to constitutional values, democratic legitimacy, and human dignity," he said.CJI Kant said that AI is reshaping governance, commerce, warfare, communication, public administration, and increasingly, the exercise of judicial and sovereign power itself."Governments now utilise algorithmic systems to allocate welfare benefits, assess immigration applications, monitor borders, regulate financial systems, and support policing functions. Militaries are rapidly developing autonomous capabilities. Courts across jurisdictions are beginning to confront questions involving AI-generated evidence, automated decision-making, and digital due process. Private corporations possess technological capacities that rival, and in some instances exceed, the informational reach of sovereign States," he said.“Artificial intelligence poses one of the most significant tests for international law in its modern evolution,” he said, adding that choices made during this decade will shape the relationship between technology, power, freedom, and justice for generations to come."The central challenge before us is to ensure that, in an age of intelligent machines, humanity retains authorship of the principles by which it is governed. If international law can rise to that challenge, artificial intelligence may become not merely a technological revolution, but an opportunity to reaffirm the values that lie at the foundation of democratic civilisation itself," he underscored.CJI Kant, who is on a six-day U.K. trip, said, artificial intelligence presents unprecedented opportunities for strengthening the administration of justice and across jurisdictions, courts are increasingly leveraging AI-driven tools to assist with legal research, case management, translation services, transcription of proceedings, document classification, and the identification of judicial precedents."When deployed responsibly and under appropriate human supervision, such technologies can help reduce delays, improve efficiency, expand access to legal information, and enable judges and court administrators to focus their attention on the more nuanced and inherently human aspects of adjudication. AI, therefore, should not be viewed solely as a source of legal complexity, but also as a powerful instrument for advancing the constitutional promise of timely, accessible, and effective justice," he said.The CJI wondered whether AI will influence international law as the transformation is already under way and the real question is whether the existing architecture of international law possesses the conceptual elasticity necessary to absorb this disruption."We need to assess if the fundamental doctrines of international law, namely sovereignty, human rights and enforceability of foreign awards/decrees will be able to adapt sufficiently to govern algorithmic power? Or are we appr
Discussion (0)