Gujarat HC dismisses plea on ASI survey of Somnath Temple, imposes Rs 2 lakh costs on petitioner

Death of a priest by 26 stab wounds: Row over 10th-century Math’s land under spotlight

$Death of a priest by 26 stab wounds: Row over 10th-century Math’s land under spotlight$

Behind the killing of Devanand Maharaj, the chief priest of Kota’s Chandresal Math, who was stabbed 26 times outside his residence earlier this month, may lie a battle for control of the 10th-century Math, its trust and 345 bighas of land – shaped by a complex interplay of caste, faith, power and money.Among the eight arrested for the June 5 murder of Devanand, 35, are another Math priest, Nandan Ban, and a Kota-based lawyer, Santosh Kumar Rai. Four people, including a minor, were hired to carry out the murder, says the Station House Officer of Borkheda Police Station, Anil Tailor, who is investigating the case.Investigators and trust members talk of an escalating dispute between Devanand and Rai, who represented the trust in a civil dispute over nominations to the Math body that controls the shrine and its vast properties. Devanand’s family says that five months before he was killed, he received death threats, asking him to leave the Math. “These recordings have been given to police,” his brother Budhraj Gurjar says.

Gujarat HC dismisses plea on ASI survey of Somnath Temple, imposes Rs 2 lakh costs on petitioner

2 min readVadodaraJun 26, 2026 04:55 AM IST

The petitioner also admitted during the hearing that the allegations in the PIL were founded entirely on newspaper reports and social media posts. THE GUJARAT High Court (HC) on Thursday dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) concerning the Somnath Temple, holding that it was based on unverified claims sourced from newspaper reports and social media posts and imposed exemplary costs of Rs 2 lakh on the petitioner. A Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Sunita Agarwal and Justice D N Ray accepted the State government’s contention that the petition was devoid of merit and amounted to an abuse of the PIL jurisdiction.The petitioner, Vilas Tukaram Kharat, a resident of Maharashtra, had sought disclosure of an alleged archaeological survey purportedly conducted beneath the Somnath Temple by the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) and IIT Gandhinagar. During the hearing, Government Pleader G H Virk, appearing for the State, argued that the petition was a “publicity litigation” intended to embroil the Shree Somnath Trust – one of the respondents to the petition – in an “unwarranted” controversy. He also pointed out factual inaccuracies in the pleadings, including the petitioner’s reliance on a purported “Shree Somnath Trust Act, 1955”, although no such legislation exists. The Bench questioned the petitioner on why he had invoked the court’s PIL jurisdiction without first approaching the competent authorities to obtain the information sought. The court further noted that although Kharat claimed to represent an NGO, Sanatan Dhamm, he had neither disclosed his occupation nor produced any material to establish his association with the organisation. The petitioner also admitted during the hearing that the allegations in the PIL were founded entirely on newspaper reports and social media posts. Observing that such petitions undermine the credibility of genuine public interest litigation, the HC dismissed the plea and imposed costs of Rs 2 lakh on the petitioner.

Gujarat HC dismisses plea on ASI survey of Somnath Temple, imposes Rs 2 lakh costs on petitioner

Death of a priest by 26 stab wounds: Row over 10th-century Math’s land under spotlight

More in general

India finish atop standings with 25 medals at ISSF Junior World Championships

Portugal predicted lineup, World Cup 2026: Will Ronaldo be benched against Uzbekistan today?

In China, there are alternate histories. In ‘Dhurandhar’, there’s an alternate present

Death of a priest by 26 stab wounds: Row over 10th-century Math’s land under spotlight

Discussion (0)