Passed over for 31 slots: Court orders regularisation of History lecturer after 24-year battle



New DelhiJun 2, 2026 12:56 PM IST The court noticed that the petitioner had already put in over 24 years of service and, on an average, 280 students studied History at the varsity in each academic session during 2013-2016. (AI-generated image) The Himachal Pradesh High Court has upheld the regularisation of a History lecturer who served for more than 24 years on a modest salary, expressing concern that the subject continued to be taught through a non-regular post despite consistent student enrolment of around 280 students every academic year between 2013 and 2016. Chief Justice G S Sandhawalia and Justice Bipin C Negi held that the Centre could not rely on the absence of a sanctioned post to deny regularisation when its own inaction had contributed to the situation.“The work noticed has been continuous, and it is disheartening to notice that the subject of History was being taught through not a regular sanctioned post, in spite of regular admissions of about 280 students during each academic session from the year 2013 to 2016,” the order read. Chief Justice G S Sandhawalia and Justice Bipin C Negi stated that if necessary, the Centre could have created a supernumerary post.The high court was hearing an appeal filed by the Centre challenging a September 17, 2025, judgment passed by a single judge that directed the regularisation of Dr Ram Narayan Thakur, a History lecturer who is now redesignated as an assistant professor in Rashtriya Sanskrit Sansthan. ‘Centre’s inaction’ The high court noted that during the pendency of the writ petition, 31 posts of assistant professors were created in 2011 when the lecturer had already completed around 20 years of service. However, it was found that nothing was done to adjust him against the said post, and now the argument sought to be raised is that there was no regular sanctioned post. Referring to a Supreme Court precedent, the high court reiterated that sanctioned posts do not “fall from heaven” and must be created by the state after assessing institutional requirements. It added that if necessary, the Centre could have created a supernumerary post to comply with the directions issued by the single judge. Served for over 2 decades The court noted that the employee was a PhD holder since 1991 and also a possessor of the degree of doctorate in the subject of History, and he had been employed to serve the authorities at a “meagre and paltry” sum of Rs 39,000 per month. It also noticed that the petitioner had already put in more than 24 years of service and, on an average, 280 students studied History in each academic session during 2013-2016. It was also found that the argument that there was no vacant sanctioned post to teach the subject of History in the “Sansthan” was falsified through the documents placed on record by the employee. The document pointed out that 17 faculty and 13 non-faculty posts were created with the approval of the competent authority in the year 2000, defeating the arguments of that institution. Arguments Central government counsel Rajinder Thakur argued that the said findings are incorrect since the creation of the posts on November 7, 2000, was only on a part-time basis, wherein it was mentioned that one of the posts of part-time lecturer of History was created. Accordingly, he has again stressed that there was no regular sanctioned post to strengthen his case. Advocate Rajesh Kumar represented the History teacher in the case. © IE Online Media Services Pvt Ltd Richa Sahay is a Legal Correspondent for The Indian Express, where she focuses on simplifying the complexities of the Indian judicial system. A law postgraduate, she leverages her advanced legal education to bridge the gap between technical court rulings and public understanding, ensuring that readers stay informed about the rapidly evolving legal landscape. Expertise Advanced Legal Education: As a law postgraduate, Richa possesses the academic depth required to interpret intricate stat
On May 25, legendary saxophonist Sonny Rollins bid the world goodbye. Over a career spanning seven decades, Rollins won a lifetime Grammy and was colloquially dubbed the “greatest living improviser” ever.He possessed an unparalleled ability to invent complex melodies on the spot, and was unrivalled in his ability to carve out unscripted notes without sheet music. This inherently raw unpredictability is the same lifeblood that would fuel hip-hop music.The chaos of a saxophone during a set does not differ greatly from the freestyle rap a Master of Ceremonies (MC) might lyricise. Unsurprisingly, Rollins’ melodic swing and wide-open saxophone breaks proved a natural canvas for hip-hop producers. At the dawn of the 90s, Rollins, alongside pioneers like Herbie Hancock and Donald Byrd, inadvertently laid the sonic foundations for what would become the jazz-rap movement. Fast forward to today, and this influence remains pervasive. Kendrick Lamar, arguably the most recognisable voice in the contemporary space, revived this fusion on his critically acclaimed album To Pimp A Butterfly, which featured a collective of live jazz artists like Terrace Martin, Kamasi Washington, and Thundercat. Similarly, acclaimed artists like Mac Miller, Tyler, The Creator, and producer Madlib have heavily leaned on jazz aesthetics to shape their defining sounds. What is jazz-rap? At its core, jazz-rap is a fusion genre that bridged the improvisational complexity of jazz with the rhythmic flow and lyrical potency of hip-hop. It is fundamentally built on the art of sampling. Instead of relying on aggressive synthesisers, 90s producers dug through crates of old vinyl records to isolate and loop micro-seconds of upright basslines, muted trumpets, and smooth drum patterns. This reliance on sampling dusty jazz records gave the genre its signature sophisticated, swinging, and introspective sound. MC Guru’s 1993 album Jazzmatazz, Vol. 1 brought jazz standards artists—especially Donald Byrd—into the hip-hop studio in an attempt to cement the bridge between the two styles. Hip-hop, however, remained markedly different from jazz, which had attained the status of a ‘high art’ through decades of gentrification. Gritty and unabashedly unapologetic about its street origins, the initial connection between the two was not a calculated artistic statement.Story continues below this ad “Some of the jazz borrowing was purely practical,” musicologist Justin A. Williams, author of Rhymin and Stealin: Musical Borrowing in Hip-Hop and the editor of The Cambridge Companion to Hip-Hop, told The Indian Express. “Hip-hoppers’ parents had a lot of jazz in their record collections. Nas’s dad was a jazz musician. I think DJ Premier’s dad had a lot of records. So it was what was around. To cite Joseph Schloss, people were sampling because it was beautiful rather than to make a statement or point things out.” How did the genre originate? The origins of jazz rap lie in the unprecedented success of its sister genre, gangsta rap. Gangsta rap, a rap sub-genre focused on the lived experiences, culture and values of urban gangs in the US, took off in the early 1990s. With the unprecedented success of N.W.A’s Straight Outta Compton (1988)—selling three million records without relying on radio play or commercial publicity—record labels were quick to recognise the emergence of a new frontier. As fresh faces like Dr Dre and Snoop Dogg burst onto the scene, hip-hop’s corporatisation began in earnest. Conglomerates like Time Warner and Universal Music (then MCA) did not shy from spending big money, with Universal purchasing a 50% stake in Interscope Records for a reported $200 million by 1996.Story continues below this ad “This power shift, and white-owned labels like Universal Music (then MCA Entertainment) and Interscope Records, meant that those in power chose gangsta rap as the dominant form of rap,” says Williams. “Gangsta rap became a target for the voyeurism of young white suburban teenagers in
Discussion (0)