Why JK Rowling is being slammed online over her 'trans women aren't women' post

A Reddit post by an employee claiming that their CEO texted them after they left work 10 minutes early has struck a chord online. Shared on r/TwentiesIndia, the post has prompted discussions on workplace expectations, micromanagement and toxic work culture, with users recounting similar experiences.CEO Texted Employee For Leaving 10 Minutes Early, Reddit Weighs In. (Representational Image)(Pexels)A Reddit post by a Gen Z employee has gone viral after they claimed that their CEO messaged them on WhatsApp for leaving work just 10 minutes before the scheduled end of the day.The post, shared by Reddit user u/InformalViolinist748 on the r/TwentiesIndia subreddit, has sparked a conversation about workplace culture, micromanagement and expectations placed on young professionals entering the workforce.The user also shared what they described as a screenshot of their WhatsApp conversation with the CEO.'My CEO Texted Me For Leaving 10 Minutes Early'Describing the incident, the Redditor wrote:"My CEO Texted Me for Leaving 10 Minutes Early."They went on to explain why the message caught them off guard."I left just 10 minutes early today, and now the CEO is texting me on WhatsApp. This is the same company that made me spend my own money on things for work and then took 17 days to reimburse me, even after I kept reminding them."The employee also alleged that workplace rules appeared to be applied inconsistently."Meanwhile, the manager disappears for hour-long breaks and nobody says a word. Other people take 30-minute breaks too. I don't even take a proper break, and the one day I leave a little early, I get a call and a text."Seeking opinions from fellow Reddit users, the poster asked:"Guys, is this normal? I literally just joined full-time, and as a Gen Z, this feels so weird. Working life is way tougher than I expected."The post also included another allegation about the employee's workplace."To make it worse, my boss keeps saying, 'Hire a social media intern even if it's unpaid or I'll make you create all the reels yourself and I am hr lol.'"Livemint could not independently verify the claims made in the Reddit post.Reddit Users Share Similar ExperiencesThe post, shared four days ago, has since attracted numerous comments, with several users saying they had encountered similar workplace situations.One Reddit user wrote:"I also did an unpaid internship for 4 months at the startup where I'm currently working full-time. My office hours are 10 AM to 7 PM, and I commute 16 km each way. They gave me permission to leave at 6 PM, but then said I'd have to come in early every morning to unlock the office. I was like, 'What?' and refused."Another commenter advised the original poster to look for another opportunity."Get an outside offer and leave this toxic shit. Some attention seeking chela of his might have reported this to him."A third user cautioned against spending personal money on office-related expenses."Never pay your own money for office stuff, OP Lesson learned I guess."Another comment read:"Typical Indore founder."One user suggested focusing on gaining experience before moving on."Don't take company seriously if they focus more on your timings than your work. Just be there for getting the experience and as soon as you get good offer, leave it."About the AuthorAnjali ThakurAnjali Thakur is a Senior Assistant Editor with Mint, reporting on trending news, entertainment and health, with a focus on stories driving digital conversations. Her work involves spotting early signals across news cycles and social media, sharpening stories for SEO and Google Discover, and mentoring young editors in digital-first newsroom practices. She is known for turning fast-moving developments—whether news-driven or culture-led—into clear, tightly edited journalism without compromising editorial rigour. Before joining Mint, she was Deputy News Editor at NDTV.com, where she led the Trending section and covered viral news, breaking developments and human-

John Cusack continues to support the ongoing student protest nationwide in India. This time, the Hollywood actor shared a post by Jeremy Corbyn, a Member of Parliament in the UK.The Islington North MP, on the other hand, shared a post by Amnesty International. The post alleges “unnecessary and excessive use of force against peaceful protesters”. “The Delhi Police responded with violent crackdowns,” it says.“Indian authorities must ensure that all allegations of unlawful conduct against these Cockroach Party-led protests are promptly, independently, and impartially investigated,” Amnesty International urges in the post.Quick answers to key questions•5 QUESTIONSThe Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) demands the resignation of Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan, ₹1 crore compensation for families of NEET victims, and no legal action against protestors.John Cusack supports the student protests as he views them as a peaceful civil disobedience movement demanding justice and addressing issues related to education reforms, particularly surrounding the NEET examination.Social media reactions varied, with some criticizing him for interfering in internal matters, while others showed support, highlighting his solid backing for the youth-led movement in India.The CJP insists that the Indian government and police should publicly apologize to student protestors who were allegedly thrashed during the demonstrations, as they view it as a necessary acknowledgment of the excessive force used.John Cusack has previously commented on various political issues in India, including the farmers’ protests, the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), and Rahul Gandhi's Bharat Jodo Yatra, showing his ongoing engagement with Indian socio-political matters.To this, Corbyn says, “Appalling violence against an unarmed, youth-led civil disobedience movement in India.” The British MP expresses “solidarity with those demanding justice”.Now, John Cusack has responded. The High Fidelity actor quoted Arundhati Roy, “For the first time in years, it feels wonderful to be Indian. Just when hope seemed lost, they came. Young roaches riding in on the rain. The progeny of the unholy union between a judge and a joke.”Cusack wrote, “They cannot beat these kids.”This is, however, not the first time that the actor spoke about this. He earlier shared a piece by Roy on the student protest, led by the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP). He called the Booker Prize winner his “favorite fellow cockroach”.John Cusack’s Past Comments on IndiaJohn Cusack has repeatedly commented on Indian political issues. Before backing CJP-led student protests over NEET exam concerns, he expressed solidarity with Rahul Gandhi's Bharat Jodo Yatra in 2022.He publicly acknowledged Gandhi's cross-country march from Kerala towards Kashmir. During 2020-2021, Cusack amplified India's farmers' protests through social media. He consistently supported demonstrations against proposed agricultural reform laws.Earlier, in 2019, he vocally opposed the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA). Cusack shared ground-level footage showing police crackdowns on students. He controversially claimed that India's economy was facing "chaos" and "civil war".Social Media ReactionSocial media users have reacted to Cusack’s latest tweet.“Who are you to interfere in our internal matters? Mind your own business. Looks like deepstate activities are activated. Try harder next time,” wrote one of them.Another user wrote, “Young stupid roaches. They are playing into the hands of the foreign deep state. The cruci-fixated religio-military-cia complex.”“You open your eyes and conscience selectively to build a narrative,” posted one user.“The ruling party has an iron grip on all institutions, including the election commission. This protest is going to be a headache for the govt, but ultimately, all the voters who are still eligible for voting are their own voters,” commented another user.About the AuthorSounak MukhopadhyaySounak Mukhopadhyay covers trendi

Addressing students through a late-night selfie video, Prime Minister Narendra Modi pledged stronger anti-paper leak laws, fast-track courts and speedy action against offenders.PM Modi latest address to students(X/@narendramodi)Prime Minister Narendra Modi's latest address to India's Gen Z has drawn attention for both its format and timing. Released at 11:52 PM on Thursday amid the ongoing controversy over the NEET paper leak, the video adopted an unusually informal style, with the Prime Minister speaking directly into his phone's selfie camera.How did the PM address Gen Z?Instead of a conventional studio setup, podium or formal backdrop with a teleprompter, PM Modi recorded the message using his phone's selfie camera. The selfie-style format drew widespread attention on social media. Addressing Gen Z as 'Friends', he focused almost entirely on concerns surrounding the NEET paper leak.The video's informal presentation, along with the Prime Minister's remarks on the NEET paper leak, also drew sharp reactions from Opposition parties.Quick answers to key questions•5 QUESTIONSPM Modi addressed concerns surrounding the NEET paper leak, speaking informally into his phone's selfie camera and referring to the audience as 'Friends'.Opposition leaders deemed the video a 'pathetic midnight video' that failed to address the pressing demands of students, including the resignation of Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan.The informal presentation style drew widespread attention and mixed reactions, with critics arguing it undermined the seriousness of the NEET controversy.Students are demanding the resignation of Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan, accountability for alleged police brutality, and a formal government response to their concerns.Critics argue that the Prime Minister should present a statement in Parliament rather than using social media, emphasizing the importance of accountability and formal discourse.Opposition reactionsCongress MP and Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi dismissed the Prime Minister's outreach as a "pathetic midnight video" and said it failed to address students' concerns."Mr. Modi, our students are demanding Dharmendra Pradhan's resignation. Don't insult their intelligence with this pathetic midnight video. 1. Sack Pradhan. 2. Punish those who beat students. 3. ⁠Apologise," Gandhi wrote on X.Congress general secretary Jairam Ramesh said the Prime Minister appeared "desperate and hassled" as he broke his silence nearly two months after the protests began.Ramesh also referred to the government's initial denial of the alleged 2026 NEET paper leak and drew parallels with the 2024 controversy."The Pradhan Mantri's lack of commitment to accountability is evident from his failure to even mention the student protests or the brutality unleashed on them by his police forces on 20th July," he said in a post on X.Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge also criticised the Prime Minister's decision to address the issue through a social media video instead of Parliament."When Parliament is in session, the Prime Minister has to give a Statement on the floor of Parliament, not make a one-sided 'Mann Ki Baat' outside Parliament by recording a video late at night!!" Kharge wrote on X.Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) national convenor Arvind Kejriwal also responded to the Prime Minister's message by posting a video highlighting the release of an accused in the 2024 NEET paper leak case. He described the Prime Minister's assurance of fast-track courts as "hollow".AAP leader Manish Sisodia also criticised the Prime Minister's outreach, writing, “Stuck with the rigidity of the stick, they've landed on 'Friends'.. Had to release the first video on Instagram at 12 midnight… This is GenZ's dominance, Remove Dharmendra Pradhan, or else who knows what else these kids will be forced to do now…”All India Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra also reacted, claiming the government was attempting damage control."Word on the street i

Mohamed Nowsath shared his experience in a post on X, expressing frustration over what he described as the absence of a social security system for taxpayers who lose their jobs.This is an AI-generated image for representational purposes only.An Indian professional's social media post claiming he paid nearly ₹1 crore in income tax over 14 years but received no support after being laid off has triggered a massive discussion on unemployment benefits, taxation, and public welfare in India.Mohamed Nowsath shared his experience in a post on X, expressing frustration over what he described as the absence of a social security system for taxpayers who lose their jobs."14 years of career, paid close to 1 crore as income tax so far. Now, being laid off. Absolutely no trace of any support system. Thank you India," Nowsath wrote in his X post two days ago.The discussion gained further momentum after he revealed that his severance package would also be subject to tax."Just learned that my severance pay will also be taxed! I don't know what to say," he wrote.Debate over social security and personal responsibilityThe viral posts prompted mixed reactions online. While several users agreed that India lacks adequate social security for people who suddenly lose their income, others argued that individuals should prepare for such situations through personal savings and emergency funds.One X user asked, "What support system is expected?"Responding to the question, Nowsath wrote: “A certain percentage of salary or income tax being paid with tax exemption for 3-6 months may be?!”Another user, Manoj Arora, compared India's system with other countries, writing: "We justify our taxes by comparing with other countries. But forget to compare the returns that the taxpayers get in those countries," referring to unemployment benefits available in countries such as the UK, Australia, Canada and France.However, not everyone agreed with Nowsath's views."I don't understand. What do these people want? The government provided tax saving avenues like EPF / NPS / 80C Etc. Who stopped us from leveraging that? And now, you can still use government hospitals/schools that are totally free, no one's stopping you!" another X user wrote.'At least provide quality public services,' says NowsathReplying to criticism, Nowsath argued that if taxpayers are not entitled to financial support during periods of unemployment, they should at least receive better public infrastructure and services in return for the taxes they pay."Many are upset that I asked for financial support during unemployment for income taxpayers," he wrote.He added: "Okay, I’m taking care of my emergency funds and not asking anything from the government, provided I get to take my kid in a stroller on the city streets without damaging my kid’s lungs and eardrums. walk on safe and convenient footpaths, let my kid cycle without the danger of being run over by trucks, spend time with family in green spaces in the city instead of malls and get across cities in 200 kmph+ trains instead of slogging on over-choked highways."His remarks have fuelled a broader online conversation about whether taxpayers should receive unemployment benefits or improved public services in return for the taxes they contribute.(Disclaimer: This report is based on user-generated content from social media. Livemint has not independently verified the claims and does not endorse them.)About the AuthorKanishka SinghariaKanishka Singharia is a Senior Content Producer at Mint with a passion for news, trends, and the stories shaping the digital world. She specialises in spotting viral narratives by constantly tracking social media platforms and turning them into engaging, reader-friendly stories. Her work ranges from fast-paced breaking updates to sensitive human-interest features, blending speed with clarity. With over four years of experience in news and trend reporting, Kanishka has worked with leading organisations such as Hindustan Ti

A pic claiming to show Cristiano Ronaldo and his fiancée Georgina Rodriguez wearing Argentina jerseys during the FIFA World Cup 2026 has been going viral on social media. However, the claim is false, with the image found to have been digitally fabricated.Photo Of Cristiano Ronaldo, Georgina Rodriguez In Argentina Jerseys Is Fake(X)A photo claiming to show football icon Cristiano Ronaldo and his fiancée Georgina Rodriguez wearing Argentina jerseys during the ongoing FIFA World Cup 2026 has gone viral on social media. The image has been shared with claims that the couple were watching a World Cup match while dressed in Argentina's colours.However, a Grok fact check found the claim to be false, concluding that the viral image had been digitally fabricated and did not depict a real moment from the tournament.What is the viral claim?The image circulating online appears to show Ronaldo and Rodriguez seated together in Argentina jerseys while watching a World Cup match. The posts suggest that the Portuguese footballer and his fiancée were supporting Argentina during the tournament.Quick answers to key questions•5 QUESTIONSNo, the claim is false. A fact check revealed that the viral image showing Ronaldo and Rodriguez in Argentina jerseys is digitally fabricated and does not represent a real moment from the tournament.Georgina Rodriguez has publicly supported Portugal and Cristiano Ronaldo throughout the tournament, consistently showcasing her allegiance to the Portuguese national team rather than Argentina.There have been various misleading posts, including claims of their engagement and fabricated images, which independent fact-checkers identified as AI-generated.Argentinians, including politicians like President Javier Milei, often avoid attending crucial matches due to superstitions that suggest their presence may bring bad luck to the national team.The fact check concluded that the viral image was not authentic and part of a trend of misinformation involving high-profile footballers, particularly around major events like the FIFA World Cup.The analysis concluded that the photograph had been digitally manipulated and that the claim accompanying it was misleading.No Evidence Of Ronaldo Wearing An Argentina JerseyThe fact check found no evidence that Cristiano Ronaldo or Georgina Rodriguez wore Argentina's national team jersey during the FIFA World Cup 2026 or at any other major international tournament.It also noted that the viral image appears to be part of a wider trend of misinformation involving high-profile footballers. In recent months, several AI-generated or digitally altered images featuring Ronaldo and Rodriguez have circulated widely across social media.Among them were viral posts falsely claiming the couple had announced their engagement or marriage proposal. Those images have previously been identified as AI-generated by independent fact-checkers.Georgina Rodriguez Publicly Backed PortugalContrary to the viral claim, Georgina Rodriguez's publicly available social media posts show that she consistently supported Portugal and Ronaldo throughout what has been described as his final FIFA World Cup campaign.During Portugal's group-stage match against Uzbekistan in June 2026, Rodriguez shared a photo on her Instagram Stories wearing Portugal's national team jersey. The image gained significant attention online as she cheered Ronaldo, who scored twice in Portugal's 5-0 victory.Following Portugal's exit from the tournament after a 1-0 defeat to Spain in the Round of 16 on July 7, 2026, Rodriguez once again expressed her support for Ronaldo on social media.She also reshared a Nike advertisement paying tribute to Ronaldo's career, reaffirming her backing for the Portuguese football legend.VerdictThe viral image claiming to show Cristiano Ronaldo and Georgina Rodriguez wearing Argentina jerseys during the FIFA World Cup 2026 is false.When is the final match?The FIFA World Cup 2026 final will be played on July 20 (12.30 am) , with

A 38-year-old woman arrested in Jaipur, Rajasthan, last week was allegedly preparing to travel to Pakistan via Nepal to marry a suspected terrorist commander believed to be a close associate of banned Jaish-e-Mohammed chief Masood Azhar, officials said on Thursday.The woman, identified as Babita Dhakad alias Khadija, was arrested by the Anti-Terror Squad of Rajasthan Police and booked under various sections of stringent Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) on Sunday. Babita is in police custody till June 27.Officials told PTI that the woman is believed to have been manipulated emotionally and was converted to Islam by a Muslim preacher online.They claimed a forensic analysis of Dhakad's electronic devices showed many Pakistani numbers, which included those suspected to be those of Yusuf Azhar, a close relative of the JeM chief, and Qari Zarar, who is wanted in India for several crimes, the officials said.During the investigation, Babita, who lived in her parents' home in Jaipur's Sitapura area, was found to have alleged links with members and supporters of the Pakistan-based banned terrorist organisation, they said.How Babita made contact with terroristsAccording to PTI, Babita said she began searching for Pakistani terrorists on social media following the Pahalgam attack in 2025 and gradually developed contacts with several individuals linked to extremist circles.She told officials during the questioning that she started by browsing Facebook pages related to Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir and sent friend requests to followers of such pages at random.Over time, she became connected with several individuals out of curiosity, the officials told PTI."An examination of her mobile phone and social media accounts revealed contacts with several Pakistani nationals and profiles allegedly associated with JeM operatives. She had been communicating with multiple Pakistan-based individuals through Facebook Messenger and WhatsApp," an official linked to the investigation said."Chats, videos and contact details allegedly linked to members of the banned outfit were recovered from her devices," the official said.He added that Babita has also confessed to have shared one-time passwords (OTPs) connected to Indian mobile numbers with a JeM operative, enabling the use of those numbers on social media and communication platforms there."'Emotional ties with Abu Ubaidah', invited to work for JeMAt some point, she became friendly with Abu Ubaidah, who initiated conversations with her."She claimed that she developed emotional ties with Abu Ubaidah and became interested in the Pakistan-based terror outfit Jaish-e-Mohammed due to her admiration for the mujahideen," the source said, quoting the FIR.They added, “She frequently viewed and liked social media posts and reels featuring weapons uploaded by members or supporters of the organisation.”"She said that Abu Ubaidah wanted to marry her and encouraged her to learn and practise Islamic teachings, including offering prayers and reading the Quran. She was invited to Pakistan to work for Jaish-e-Mohammed. As part of the process, she was asked to obtain a passport," the FIR said.She discussed travel arrangements with Abu Ubaidah and the cleric, who suggested routes through Nepal, Saudi Arabia or the United Arab Emirates.They also discussed funding her travel expenses through cryptocurrency, after which she downloaded cryptocurrency-related applications and researched the subject online.The sources told PTI that the woman admitted to sharing one-time passwords (OTPs) received on her Indian mobile numbers to her Pakistani handler so he could operate WhatsApp on her numbers there."The woman spent several hours chatting and video-calling with Abu Ubaidah. She later learned that he was married, which left her disappointed," the official source said.He also claimed that Babita searched online for methods of making explosives and had been informed by her Pakistani handler about networks operating in

A Reddit post has sparked a wide-ranging discussion about parenting, trust and teenage relationships. The original poster, a parent of a 14-year-old girl, described a genuine dilemma. Her daughter wants to have a sleepover at the home of her girlfriend, also 14. The two present themselves as friends to everyone around them.The parent feels trapped between two difficult outcomes. Saying no may signal that honesty leads to punishment. Saying yes may mean approving something she has never anticipated. "My whole self wants to say no, but this is a lose-lose situation," she wrote.She clarified that the planned sleepover was in a living room, a shared public space. The two teenagers had never been on a date. There had been no physical contact."My daughter swears they don't do anything — even hold hands. I believe this so far. And she assures me she doesn’t want to. They are also besties, and this is what besties do," the parent added.This report is based on user-generated content from social media. LiveMint has not independently verified the claims and does not endorse them. The user's location remains unidentified.The Reddit post attracted over 1,100 comments. Responses ranged from fully supportive to dramatically cautious. One commenter offered a practical framework from personal experience. Parents would simply announce a plan at the start, check in periodically, and bring food."Made us too paranoid to do anything serious but also gave us our space and privacy," they recalled.The trust argument dominated much of the thread. Several commenters urged the parent not to penalise her daughter for her honesty."If it's a supervised living room sleepover and they've been honest with you, I'd focus on maintaining that trust," one user wrote. "The honesty is worth a lot."Teenage BehaviourMany users took a broader view of teenage behaviour."Kids who are interested in intimacy WILL find a way to make it happen. Doesn't matter if it's at home or somewhere else. If they want to do it, it will happen," one commenter noted."Make sure she feels she can rely on you and trust you. Because, if they want to fool around, they will. All you can do is set yourself up, so she feels comfortable talking to you about it if something happens."One Reddit user wrote, “My instinct is no... Your early sexual experiences can set you up for later sexual experiences - they can enhance, or taint, the way you view sex for life.”One parent who had raised LGBT children offered specific advice. They recommended sitting down with both teenagers together. Setting clear expectations while treating them with respect, they argued, was the most effective approach.“I told my teens that I would always trust them until they gave me a reason not to,” wrote one parent.The parent updated her post twice. She noted that comments ranged from "yes, trust her" to "no, I'd call the cops on you". She appeared bemused by the extremes. "At 14, I didn't even cross the busy street my mum told me to avoid," she wrote.About the AuthorSounak MukhopadhyaySounak Mukhopadhyay covers trending news, sports and entertainment for LiveMint. His reporting focuses on fast-moving stories, box office performance, digital culture and major cricket developments. He combines real-time updates with clear context for everyday readers. Sounak brings newsroom experience across breaking news, explainers and long-form features. He has a strong emphasis on accuracy, verification and responsible storytelling. His work tracks audience behaviour, celebrity influence and the business of sport and cinema. He helps readers understand why a story matters beyond the headline. Sounak has contributed to widely read digital publications. He continues to build a body of journalism shaped by consistency, speed and editorial clarity. He is particularly interested in the intersection of media, popular culture and public conversation in contemporary India. At LiveMint, he writes daily coverage as well as a