12 states sue to block Paramounts $110B Warner Bros deal



In Brief Posted: 1:55 PM PDT · July 25, 2026 Image Credits:Victor J. Blue/Bloomberg / Getty Images Warner Bros. Discovery filed a lawsuit this week accusing Amazon of interference with contractual relations, breach of contract, and unfair competition. As reported by Deadline, the lawsuit alleges Amazon has been “hurriedly seeking to pirate away a number of contracted employees,” including Pia Barlow, an HBO Max marketing executive who recently joined Amazon MGM Studios. Warner Bros. (whose pending acquisition by Paramount has been paused for at least a few months) said Barlow’s employment contract was “not set to expire until October 31, 2027.” “In blatant disregard of established California law, Amazon has gone rogue by attempting to induce Plaintiffs’ employees with term employment agreements to breach those agreements with impunity, backed up with the ready assurance that Amazon will defend and indemnify them should they be held to account for their blatantly unlawful acts,” Warner Bros. said. The company also accused Amazon of seeking to “tortiously induce another WBD employee to breach their term employment agreement, which was not set to expire until December 2027,” although that executive (believed to be HBO programming executive Francesca Orsi) ultimately stayed at Warner Bros. Deadline noted that this lawsuit is likely to renew debates about whether term employment agreements are actually enforceable under California law. Amazon MGM Studios declined to comment. Topics Subscribe for the industry’s biggest tech news Latest in Government & Policy
Image Credits:Paramount 10:58 AM PDT · July 20, 2026 Paramount Skydance’s proposed acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery has hit a roadblock after a judge temporarily paused the deal in response to a lawsuit filed by a coalition of 12 state attorneys general who argue that the merger would harm competition. U.S. District Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín issued a 14-day pause on Monday after hearing arguments from both sides last week. The coalition, which is being led by California Attorney General Rob Bonta, could seek another pause after the 14 days, further delaying the merger. The lawsuit from the states alleges that the deal would harm movie theaters, basic cable distributors, and audiences. They argue that if the two companies are allowed to merge, it would lessen competition in three areas: wide release theatrical film distribution, “top-grossing” theatrical distribution, and basic cable licensing. “This is a critical first win in our case to ensure this megamerger never sees the light of day,” said Attorney General Bonta in a statement. “History tells the tale of what happens when a few people have great power over markets that are central to Americans’ lives: fewer opportunities for more people, worse products and services for all people. With our lawsuit, we’re fighting for a free and fair market and a thriving film and television industry that serves creatives and audiences alike. We have a full tank of gas, the law on our side, and look forward to continuing to make our case.” The deal would combine two notable film studios as well as streaming platforms Paramount+ and HBO Max. It would also create one of the largest portfolios of television networks, bringing together Paramount’s CBS and MTV with WBD’s CNN and HBO. Paramount CEO David Ellison had said in May that the transaction was on track to close by September. The legal roadblock has the potential to derail Paramount’s efforts to transform into a major competitor to companies like Netflix. The proposed acquisition has received scrutiny from filmmakers, actors, and industry professionals who argued that the deal would reduce competition and further consolidate the U.S. media industry. Paramount and WBD did not immediately respond to TechCrunch’s requests for comment. Topics When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence. Aisha is a consumer news reporter at TechCrunch. Prior to joining the publication in 2021, she was a telecom reporter at MobileSyrup. Aisha holds an honours bachelor’s degree from University of Toronto and a master’s degree in journalism from Western University. You can contact or verify outreach from Aisha by emailing aisha@techcrunch.com or via encrypted message at aisha_malik.01 on Signal. View Bio
A coalition of 12 state attorneys general is filing a lawsuit to block the merger of Paramount Skydance and Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD), alleging that the deal would harm movie theaters, basic cable distributors, and audiences. The coalition, led by California Attorney General Rob Bonta, argues that the acquisition violates the Clayton Act, which prohibits mergers that may substantially lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly. The attorneys general allege that if the two companies are allowed to merge, it would lessen competition in three areas: wide release theatrical film distribution, “top-grossing” theatrical distribution, and basic cable licensing. The deal would combine two notable film studios as well as streaming platforms Paramount+ and HBO Max. It would also create one of the largest portfolios of television networks, bringing together Paramount’s CBS and MTV with WBD’s CNN and HBO. The proposed acquisition has already received scrutiny from filmmakers, actors and industry professionals who have argued that the deal would reduce competition and further consolidate the U.S. media industry. Paramount has argued against this, saying the combined film studios would release 30 movies a year. The states argue that, if approved, the deal would give Paramount significant control over key areas of the entertainment industry, including 27% of the U.S. film distribution market, 30% of blockbuster movie distribution, and 27% of the basic cable channel market. “Consolidation here not only leads to higher prices — it also leads to fewer opportunities for important stories to come to life, and fewer ways for audiences to encounter stories, ideas, and perspectives beyond their own experiences,” Bonta said in a statement. “In this country, no one is above the law. With this lawsuit, California and our sister states are fighting for free and fair markets, not rigged markets. America has no kings in government or our economy.” Paramount CEO David Ellison had said in May that the transaction was on track to close the deal by September. The deal received approval from WBD shareholders in April, and has been cleared by the U.S. Department of Justice, which said the transaction is not likely to result in harm to competition or consumers. The 11 states joining California are Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, and Washington. Paramount and WBD did not immediately respond to TechCrunch’s requests for comment. When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence. Aisha is a consumer news reporter at TechCrunch. Prior to joining the publication in 2021, she was a telecom reporter at MobileSyrup. Aisha holds an honours bachelor’s degree from University of Toronto and a master’s degree in journalism from Western University. You can contact or verify outreach from Aisha by emailing aisha@techcrunch.com or via encrypted message at aisha_malik.01 on Signal. View Bio
Discussion (0)