#case

Stories and news related to case.

26 stories

Murder of student in Ghaziabad: Main accused killed following encounter with police

Politics

42updates

kochioverlive

Murder of student in Ghaziabad: Main accused killed following encounter with police

The deceased was a first-year B.Sc. student at the Government First Grade College in Sedam. | Photo Credit: Illustration by Satheesh Vellinezhi A 19-year-old college student allegedly ended her life in BCM girls’ hostel at Vishwa Nagar in Sedam town of Kalaburagi district in Karnataka on June 24.The deceased has been identified as Chandrika Thippeswamy, a resident of Hanganahalli village in Sedam taluk.Chandrika was a first-year B.Sc. student at the Government First Grade College in Sedam. According to preliminary reports, she had been staying in a separate room in the hostel due to health issues.The incident is suspected to have taken place after 10 a.m. when she was alone in the hostel room. The exact reason behind her taking the extreme step is yet to be ascertained.Following the incident, Circle Police Inspector Mahadev Diddimani and Police Sub-Inspector Upendra Kumar visited the spot to conduct a preliminary inspection.A case has been registered at Sedam Police Station.(If you are in distress or having suicidal tendencies, please reach out to these helplines: Tele MANAS at 1-8008914416/ 14416, NIMHANS at 08026685948, 9480829670 or SAHAI at 080 25497777, +91-9886444075) Published - June 25, 2026 12:57 pm IST

general

2updates

casebharatfair

Bharat Tiwari Case: JDU, BJP Assure Fair Probe, Say No Injustice Will Be Done

Bharat Tiwari Case: JDU, BJP Assure Fair Probe, Say No Injustice Will Be Done NDTV

Khan Sir case: Autopsy indicates no foul play in death of accused in Nepal hotel

general

4updates

workarresteddalit

Khan Sir case: Autopsy indicates no foul play in death of accused in Nepal hotel

5 min readNew DelhiJun 23, 2026 03:50 PM IST A Rajasthan hotel was ordered to pay Rs 12,020 after charging a consumer Rs 20 above the MRP for two mineral water bottles.(AI generated Image)A consumer who was charged Rs 20 extra on two mineral water bottles at a hotel in Chittorgarh has secured Rs 12,020 payout from the Rajasthan State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, which held that unlawful overcharging, even of a small amount, cannot be ignored merely because the monetary loss suffered by the consumer is minimal. Judicial member Mukesh and member Raminivas Saraswat from Circuit Bench at Udaipur, was hearing an appeal filed by consumer Ashish Kumar Kothari against Hotel The Grand Chittor (The Alfresco) after he challenged a June 26, 2024 order of the District Consumer Commission, Chittorgarh.“It is not necessary that a consumer cannot suffer mental agony merely because the excess amount charged is Rs 20. When an additional amount is illegally collected from a consumer, the mental distress naturally caused by such conduct cannot be ignored,” the commission said on June 19, 2026. Background Ashish Kumar Kothari visited Hotel The Grand Chittor, Chittorgarh, on January 31, 2022, and ordered food along with two bottles of mineral water. The hotel generated a bill of Rs 2,199 for the meal, which included charges for the two water bottles purchased by the consumer. Upon examining the bill, Kothari noticed that each bottle carried an MRP of Rs 20 but had been billed at Rs 30. Kothari claimed that he immediately objected to the excess charge and requested that the amount be refunded to him. According to the complaint, the hotel staff refused to return the excess amount despite being informed that the charge exceeded the printed MRP. Alleging deficiency in service and unfair trade practice, Kothari subsequently approached the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chittorgarh. District commission’s decision On June 26, 2024, the district commission partly allowed the complaint and directed the hotel to refund the excess amount of Rs 20. The commission also awarded litigation costs of Rs 1,100 but declined to grant any compensation for mental agony. Unsatisfied with the limited relief, Kothari challenged the order before the Rajasthan State Consumer Commission. He argued that the district commission failed to adequately compensate him for the inconvenience and harassment caused by the hotel’s conduct.Story continues below this ad Hotel’s defence The hotel denied any deficiency in service and contended that customers visited the establishment not only for food but also for its ambience and facilities. It submitted that the property offered several amenities and that guests paid for the overall experience available at the hotel. The hotel further maintained that branded mineral water had been supplied and sought dismissal of the complaint. Appeal proceedings Before the state commission, Kothari argued that the hotel had charged one-and-a-half times the MRP for the water bottles sold to him.Story continues below this ad He also submitted that pursuing consumer litigation involves expenditure of time, effort and resources beyond mere filing expenses. According to him, the district commission erred in not awarding compensation for the mental harassment resulting from the unlawful charge. The hotel, on the other hand, argued that an excess charge of Rs 20 could not reasonably be treated as causing mental agony. It further contended that the complainant had not suffered any substantial loss warranting enhancement of compensation.Story continues below this ad Findings of the state commission The state commission noted that the hotel had not challenged the finding of deficiency in service recorded by the district commission. As a result, the finding that the consumer had been wrongly overcharged had attained finality. Rejecting the hotel’s argument on mental agony, the commission held that the amount involved was not the dete

Ayodhya Ram temple donation case: SIT submits preliminary report to U.P. government

Politics

3updates

casetempledonation

Ayodhya Ram temple donation case: SIT submits preliminary report to U.P. government

A file image of the Ayodhya Ram temple. | Photo Credit: ANI The Special Investigation Team (SIT) probing the alleged irregularities in donations at the Ayodhya Ram Temple submitted its preliminary report on Tuesday to the Uttar Pradesh government.The team visited the office of Additional Chief Secretary (Home) Sanjay Prasad and handed over the report. Officials said the document is currently a preliminary report and further investigation may be required.They said the Special Investigation Team (SIT) probe is still underway and further facts are being gathered.The Uttar Pradesh government had on June 13 constituted the SIT on a request from the temple trust following allegations of misappropriation of donations received at the Ayodhya Ram temple.(With inputs from PTI) Published - June 23, 2026 12:56 pm IST

Indian court tells Apple to 'cooperate' in antitrust case

Politics

35updates

supremecourtover

Indian court tells Apple to 'cooperate' in antitrust case

K. Sudhakaran, MP, tendered an unconditional apology before the Kerala High Court on Monday regarding his remarks about the High Court Bench that had quashed a single judge’s verdict that ordered a CBI probe into the murder of Youth Congress leader S.P. Shuhaib.The apology was made in an affidavit submitted to the High Court on a contempt of court petition filed against him. The petition alleged that Mr. Sudhakaran’s statements amounted to an “imputation against the judiciary”.Mr. Sudhakaran admitted to making derogatory statements against the Kerala High Court at a public function and stated that the remarks were of “a purely momentary and impulsive nature and were not the result of calculated, malicious intent”. He had made the alleged statement while inaugurating a protest march by Congress workers to the Chavakkad police station. Published - June 22, 2026 11:52 pm IST

ESIC launches free annual health check-up programme for insured workers above 40

Politics

8updates

shootingfreecase

ESIC launches free annual health check-up programme for insured workers above 40

Image for representation only. | Photo Credit: The Hindu A State renowned for being the model of public health in the country and one which has consistently recorded some of the best health indicators nationwide, is now battling recurrent outbreaks of various water-borne diseases such as shigellosis. The irony is stark, for Kerala has demonstrated the responsiveness and resilience of its health system by having a firm grip on a disease as unpredictable and complex as Nipah.Now, rapid urbanisation and social development on the one side and inadequate attention paid to environmental health, water quality measures, poor sewage and sanitation infrastructure on the other, is threatening to undo the State’s reputation as a beacon of good public health. The explosion of water-borne diseases and zoonotic diseases in the State points to the system’s failure to pay attention to the social and environmental determinants of health.Also Read | Kerala plans ‘outbreak calendar’ to boost disease prediction and responseScale of contaminationA look at the outbreaks of Acute Diarrhoeal Diseases (ADD), Hepatitis A, shigellosis and norovirus in recent years gives an indication of the impact of groundwater contamination on people’s health.Between four to five lakh cases of ADD are reported every year in the State. Since the past two decades, Kerala has also been experiencing several large and small Hepatitis A outbreaks. In 2025, the State reported 31,536 cases and 82 deaths due to Hep A. This year too, as of June 15, close to 9,000 cases and 25 confirmed deaths have been reported.Amoebic meningoencephalitis, which has also emerged as a significant public health problem in Kerala, is being linked to the faecal contamination in domestic wells, in which free-living amoeba thrive. This infection has claimed the highest number of lives in the State, with 134 cases and 34 deaths reported as of June 15 this year.Various studies have reported that groundwater resources in the State have been under increasing stress, with 62% of the population depending on ground water from close to 7 million wells.Also Read | Kerala Health Minister calls for concerted approach to prevent infectious diseasesLack of sewage systemAs of 2025, Kerala has less than 6% proper sewerage network coverage, with most major cities having virtually no household sewage collection systems. The CAG’s 2025 report stated that at the closure of the AMRUT Mission, a Central initiative aimed at ensuring universal access to safe water and reliable sewerage connections across urban areas, Kerala’s overall achievement was just 11.25% and only 0.13% households got sewerage connections.While Kerala does have high sanitation coverage with a significant proportion of households relying on septic tanks or on-site sanitation systems, these septic tanks are poorly designed and located close to domestic wells which lead to groundwater contamination. The fact that Kerala is one of the most densely populated States with small landholdings and houses situated close to each other aggravates the issue. High levels of faecal contamination have been reported in over 70% of the open wells in the State by agencies such as the Centre for Water Resources Development and Management. A study in the urban areas of Thiruvananthapuram in 2018 had reported that coliform contamination was prevalent in 73% of wells and that well chlorination and cleaning practices were inadequate.Recurring outbreaks of Hepatitis A and shigellosis in the State showed that almost all outbreaks had been in rural areas and were linked to the local source of drinking water. Epidemiological investigations have revealed that water for regional supply systems is often pumped into supply lines without adequate chlorination or filtration, and that these lines often run close to sewage drains — any breaks in the pipeline can lead to major contamination.It is also true that most of the interventions to provide safe drinking water to people lie outsi

Jeffrey Epstein case: Ex-prison guard Tova Noel rejects cover-up claims, says she has faced relentless threats

Economy

4updates

guardcaseinternal

Jeffrey Epstein case: Ex-prison guard Tova Noel rejects cover-up claims, says she has faced relentless threats

Pakistan's President Asif Ali Zardari expressed concern over alleged demolitions of historic Muslim sites in India, calling for an immediate halt to such actions. The Indian Ministry of External Affairs rejected his claims, asserting Pakistan has no standing to comment on India's internal matters.Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) Spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal addresses the press conference, in New Delhi(ANI)The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) on Saturday rejected comments made by Pakistan President Asif Ali Zardari claiming “threats to Muslim religious sites in India”, calling the remark "absurd". In a statement, the MEA also made it clear that the Pakistan President had "no locus standi to comment on matters that are internal to India".What MEA saidResponding to media queries on the remarks made by the Pakistani President, MEA Spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said that India "categorically rejects" the comments and described them as unwarranted interference in the country's internal affairs."India categorically rejects the unwarranted comments made by the President of Pakistan. He has, in any case, no locus standi to comment on matters that are internal to India," Jaiswal said in a statement.The MEA also pointed out that the remarks were particularly ironic given Pakistan's own human rights record and treatment of minorities."These comments are particularly absurd given Pakistan's own abysmal record on human rights, which is a matter of global commentary. Pakistan's long history of systematically targeting and victimizing minorities across various faiths is notorious," the spokesperson said.The ministry also alleged that the comments reflected Pakistan's broader political approach toward India."Given this reality, the President's remarks can only be read as a deliberate political attack, driven by Pakistan's national policies of bigotry and hatred," the statement added.Pakistan President's post on XThe MEA's response came after Pakistan President Asif Ali Zardari issued a statement on alleged demolitions and threats to historic Muslim religious sites in India.In a statement on X, Zardari referred to the alleged demolition threats facing the historic Masjid Ganj Shaheeda in Varanasi and urged Indian authorities to halt such actions."President Asif Ali Zardari expressed deep concern over the demolitions and threats to historic Muslim religious sites in India, including the 1,000-year-old Masjid Ganj Shaheeda in Varanasi. He asked India to immediately stop such actions, warning that they risk leading to the disintegration and perennial chaos of India. He called for an immediate halt to such actions and urged the protection of minority rights and shared cultural heritage," the statement said.Kashi Railway Station expansionAccording to reports, railway authorities issued a notice directing the Ganj Shaheeda mosque near Kashi Railway Station to vacate the premises as part of the station expansion project.The Intajamia Masjid Committee has objected to the eviction notice and rejected allegations that it is located on encroached railway land. They argued that the Ganj Shahida Mosque has a history of approximately 1,000 years and existed there long before the railways.Station Superintendent Arpit Gupta of Cant Railway Station said the land around Kashi Railway Station needs to be cleared of encroachments for the station's expansion and proposed construction works."Various locations have been identified and action is being taken accordingly," Gupta said.He said the Railways and the district administration had earlier carried out anti-encroachment drives in and around Kashi Railway Station. As part of a joint exercise, a Hanuman temple and the Ajmer Shaheed mosque situated in the Rajghat area had already been removed, he said.The notice was issued days after the demolition of the Azgaib Shaheed Mazar and a mosque located within the railway station premises on June 3, following a court order in a land-ownership dispute.Officials had said

SIT to move court for custody of DYFI leader in ‘kafir screenshot’ case

Politics

8updates

staysupremecourt

SIT to move court for custody of DYFI leader in ‘kafir screenshot’ case

Representative image. | Photo Credit: Getty Images/iStockphoto The West Bengal government on Thursday (June 18, 2026) approached the Supreme Court challenging a Delhi High Court order directing the release of Rashid Khan, who is serving a life sentence in the 1993 Bowbazar blast case that left 69 people dead in Kolkata. The State sought urgent intervention from the apex court to prevent his release.The counsel representing the State sought urgent listing of the matter before a Bench of Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justice V. Mohana, contending that the case involved a “very serious offence” and should be heard on Monday (June 22). He also pointed out that the June 5 judgment of the High Court had erred in directing Khan’s premature release despite the State Sentence Review Board (SSRB) having repeatedly declined his requests for remission.During the hearing, the Chief Justice sought to know the period of incarceration already undergone by Khan. In response, the counsel for the State submitted that he had spent nearly 30 years in prison, including the remission earned during his incarceration.Also read: A new lease of life under the sun for death row prisoners The Chief Justice thereafter agreed to consider the State’s request for listing the matter.Khan was convicted on August 31, 2001, for offences under the Indian Penal Code, the Explosives Act, and the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA) in connection with the March 16, 1993, blast that struck a densely populated area of Kolkata. Since his arrest in 1993, he has remained behind bars.Also read:For Delhi’s lifers, release after 14 yrs becomes a board gameSeeking remission, the convict submitted that he had spent more than 33 years in custody and was now 77 years old. He relied on his advanced age and various medical conditions, including age-related ailments, in support of his plea. He also pointed out that a co-convict, Pannalal Jaysowara, had been granted premature release in March 2014.The court was apprised that the SSRB had recommended his release on March 25, 2015, but the recommendation was subsequently reviewed and rejected in September that year.The State, however, opposed the plea, maintaining that Khan was the “mastermind” behind the blast and was not entitled to premature release given the serious nature of the crime and its impact on public safety.‘Reformative approach’In a judgment delivered on June 5, the High Court directed Khan’s premature release, holding that the period of incarceration already undergone was sufficient to meet the objectives of punishment and deterrence. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna noted that the SSRB had, in 2015, recommended Khan’s release after assessing his conduct and other relevant considerations.The court observed that the subsequent decision to deny remission was not founded on any fresh material and largely relied on factors that had already been considered while making the earlier recommendation.While acknowledging that the offence had a significant impact on society, the High Court emphasised that the remission framework is premised on the principle of reformation rather than retribution.“There has been a reformative approach taken with respect to convicts in cases of remission rather than a retributive approach. In such a case, to keep the petitioner in jail, when he has already spent over 33 years in prison, may not be fruitful in any manner. The punishment undergone by the petitioner has sufficiently fulfilled the deterrence sought to be induced in a convict who has committed such grave offence,” the court said.The High Court was also unconvinced by the State’s argument that Khan remained a threat to society, noting his conduct during parole, positive assessments by prison authorities and the absence of any adverse reports regarding his behaviour. Published - June 18, 2026 03:02 pm IST

CMRL pay-off case: Company MD Sasidharan Kartha’s daughter appears before ED for questioning

Politics

4updates

casecompanycmrl

CMRL pay-off case: Company MD Sasidharan Kartha’s daughter appears before ED for questioning

T. Veena, daughter of former Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan, appears at the zonal office of the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in Kochi on Wednesday (June 17, 2026) | Photo Credit: Thulasi Kakkat T. Veena, daughter of former Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan, appeared at the zonal office of the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in Kochi on Wednesday (June 17, 2026) for questioning in connection with the probe into the Cochin Minerals and Rutile Ltd (CMRL) pay-off case.She turned up at the office around 10.25 a.m. P.A. Mohamed Riyas, her husband and Beypore MLA, accompanied her in a vehicle and left the premises after she entered the ED office.This is the first time she is appearing before the investigation agency at its office in the probe linked to allegations that CMRL made payments amounting to ₹2.78 crore to her now-defunct Exalogic IT company without receiving any services in return.Security beefed upThe security at the ED office was beefed up ahead of her questioning in view of the violent incidents that occurred during the raids held by the central agency at the residence of Mr. Vijayan in Thiruvananthapuram on May 27, 2026. The police had then arrested workers of Communist Party of India (Marxist) and Democratic Youth Federation of India (DYFI) on charges of attacking the vehicles carrying the ED officials. The personnel of Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) and Kerala Police have been posted at the entrance of the ED office as part of the enhanced security measures.Though she was asked to appear for questioning on June 12, Ms. Veena had sought postponement of appearance citing health grounds. The ED later issued a fresh summons directing her to appear on June 17.The agency had questioned Shiby S. Kartha, daughter of CMRL managing director Sasidharan S. Kartha, on Monday. On Tuesday, the ED questioned Saran S. Kartha, joint managing director of CMRL, and Jaya S. Kartha, wife of Mr. Sasidharan Kartha. She is the director of Empower India Capital Investments Pvt Ltd operated by Mr. Sasidharan Kartha, which had extended loans worth ₹50 lakh to Exalogic despite the company allegedly failing to make timely repayments.According to the ED, CMRL was searched by Income Tax Department in January 2019 during which certain fake expenses to the extent of about 130 crore was identified. The fake expenses were also admitted by CMRL before the Income Tax Settlement Commission [ITSC]. The ITSC found that the company gave bribe to various persons. An investigation by the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) under the Ministry of Corporate Affairs revealed fictitious cash expenses of about 182 crore over a span of 15 years, which was allegedly used by CMRL to bribe various persons, it said.The ED had registered a case under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) on the basis of a prosecution complaint filed by the SFIO before a court in Ernakulam in April 2025. During the course of the raids, the agency had frozen ₹18.36 crore in 242 accounts identified during the search operations held in the pay-off case. Published - June 17, 2026 10:49 am IST

Casualty Of Punjab BJP's Kewal Singh Dhillion Move: Internal Cohesion

general

2updates

singhpunjabbjps

Casualty Of Punjab BJP's Kewal Singh Dhillion Move: Internal Cohesion

2 min readChandigarhJun 9, 2026 04:25 AM IST The land, valued at Rs 5,000 crore at current rates, is part of the estate belonging to Sardar Bhagwant Singh, an erstwhile king, and is located in seven villages of Panchkula district. (Representational image) Ambala Divisional Commissioner Sanjeev Verma has directed to cancel mutation of over 810 acres of land in the names of private owners in seven villages of Panchkula district. The land, valued at Rs 5,000 crore at current rates, is part of the estate belonging to Sardar Bhagwant Singh, an erstwhile king, and is located in seven villages of Panchkula district. The order passed by Verma on May 26, exercising his quasi-judicial powers, also directs that the entire landholding be mutated in the name of the state government.A substantial portion of the disputed land is situated along the National Highway-7 corridor connecting Panchkula and Yamunanagar. Several residential projects, including some belonging to the VIPs, have already come up on parts of the land over the years. The dispute pertains to around 1,394 acres spread across seven villages of Panchkula district — Beed Babupur, Beed Firozadi, Bhareli, Sangrana, Barwala, Jaloli and Fatehpur Viran. The land belonged to Bhagwant Singh who died in 1960, leaving behind seven legal heirs, who could claim part of the estate. For the past over seven decades, legal proceedings have been ongoing to determine what they could inherit and the surplus, which, as per law, must vest in the state government. According to a report submitted by the Panchkula Tehsildar, of the total landholding, 583 acres, 3 kanals and 16 marlas had been mutated in favour of the state government, while the remaining 810 acres, 5 kanals and 7 marlas are recorded in the names of private landowners. The Commissioner held that the surplus land case must be decided by treating the entire landholding as belonging to Sardar Bhagwant Singh. The order notes that the status of the landholding has to be assessed as it existed on April 15, 1953, the reference date under the Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953. Holding that the entire estate vests in the state government under the applicable land ceiling laws, the Commissioner directed that the remaining 810 acres, 5 kanals and 7 marlas standing in the names of private owners be mutated in favour of the state government. © The Indian Express Pvt Ltd

TMC takes SIR row to Supreme Court after BJP victory in Bengal polls: ‘Winning margin in 31 seats less than deletions’

Economy

12updates

supremecourtcrore

TMC takes SIR row to Supreme Court after BJP victory in Bengal polls: ‘Winning margin in 31 seats less than deletions’

Patiala house court on Wednesday framed formal charges against Bollywood actor Jacqueline Fernandez, Sukesh Chandrasekhar, and Leena Maria Paul in the money laundering case. They have been put on trial by the court.The charges are also formally framed in MCOCA linked with Extortion Allegations against Sukesh Chandrasekhar, Leena Maria Paul and others.Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) Prashant Sharma formally framed charges against the respective accused persons in the Money laundering case and MCOCA case linked with the alleged extortion of Rs. 200 crores from Aditi Singh.Bollywood actor Jacqueline Fernandez appeared before the court and denied the charges. She claimed a trial in a money laundering case. She is Accused in money laundering case only.However, Sukesh signed the charges in the money laundering case; he refused to sign the charges in the MCOCA case.His wife, Leena Maria, signed the charges in protest in the MCOCA case.All others signed the charges and claimed a trial. There are 17 accsued in the MCOCA case and 21 accused in the money laundering case.The money laundering case is listed for hearing on July 16, and the MCOCA Case is listed for hearing on July 14.The court will record the prosecution's evidence in both cases as per the list of witnesses provided by the prosecution.On May 30, the court had directed framing of charges against Sukesh Chandrasekhar, Leena Maria Paul, Bollywood actor Jacqueline Fernandes and others in an alleged money laundering case linked with Rs. 200 crores alleged extortion from Aditi Singh.The charges have also been directed to be framed against Sukesh Chandrasekhar, Leena Maria Paul and others in the MCOCA case linked with the Rs. 200 crores alleged extortion. Jacqueline is not an accused in the extortion case.What did the judge say?Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) Prashant Sharma directed to frame charges against the accused persons in both cases." I conclude that prima facie, there is sufficient material on record based upon which strong suspicion is raised against all accused persons namely Sukesh Chandrasekhar, Leena Maria Paul alias Leena Paulose, Deepak Ramnani, Pradeep Ramdanee, B. Mohanraj, Arun Muthu, D. Kamlesh Kothari, Pinky Irani, Jacqueline Fernandez, Pooja Singh, Dharam Singh Meena, Mahender Prasad Sundriyal, Sunder Bora, Komal Poddar, Jitender Narula, Avinash Kumar, Jai Prakash Singhal, for which said accused persons have to be charged with offence under section 3 of PMLA, punishable under section 4 of PMLA," ASJ Prashant Sharma while framing charges in money laundering case.Delhi Police had filed a case on the Complaint of Aditi Singh. Thereafter, a case of Money laundering was lodged by the Enforcement Directorate.The Delhi High Court had rejected the plea of Jacqueline Fernandes seeking the quashing of the supplementary charge sheet against her. She was named in a supplementary charge sheet filed by the ED.After taking cognisance of ED's charge sheet, an issued summons to Jacqueline Fernandes. She was granted bail after she appeared before the court.Sukesh Chandrasekhar is in custody. However, his wife was granted bail by the High Court in a money laundering case. Her plea for bail in MCOCA was rejected by the Delhi High Court. The bail pleas of other accused are subjudice before the Delhi High Court.On June 1, the Delhi High Court refused to stay the formal framing of charges. Sukesh Chandrasekhar has approached the High Court.Recently, the Bollywood actor Jacqueline Fernandes withdrew her application to turn approver in a money laundering case. (ANI)Stay updated with the latest Trending, India , World and US news. HomeNewsIndia ₹200 crore extortion case: Court frames charges; Jacqueline Fernandez, Sukesh Chandrasekhar, Leena Maria Paul, othersMore

general

2updates

casetakespersonal

In sovereignty case, personal liberty takes back seat: SC

In sovereignty case, personal liberty takes back seat: SC The Times of India